ISSN E 2409-2770
ISSN P 2521-2419

Life Cycle Assessment of Monocrystalline Versus Polycrystalline Imported Photovoltaic Panels in Context of Energy


 


Vol. 7, Issue 12, PP. 422-428, December 2020

DOI

Keywords: Energy Payback period (EPBT), Global warming potential (GWP)

Download PDF


Solar energy is one of the most promising and sustainable energy suppliers among other energies. Geologically Pakistan is residing in the territory of highest solar radiation fall in the world. The average radiation falls is range from 4.656 - 4.864 kWh/m2/day daily on Pakistan. It shows the high potential solar energy exists in Pakistan, but still Pakistan is unsuccessful to trap solar energy in abundant manner due to many reason. Pakistan is facing energy crisis for many years and still many of the regions are not electrified due to accessibility and other issues. So the local people are using the standalone solar system for fulfilling the basic need but the survey found very bad quality solar panels selling in the market which are imported from china and other countries. However, it discourages indirectly the local people by using such panels by getting the low output. So this research is carried to conduct the life cycle assessment (LCA) of solar module. It is a technique that quantifies the product impact on the environment and identifies other important factors which ensure the quality and market development. In this research the LCA found the processes and operation used in manufacturing the solar module, which contribute larger part in the emission and energy consumption. The transformation of metallurgical grade silicon to solar grade silicon and panels assembly is the two main processes which consumed more than 70% of energy and take part in higher emission. The results showed 1416 MJ/panel and about 79 kg of equivalent CO2/panel generated. So it is proposed that Pakistan should start their manufacturing.


  1. Malik Amad Khalil, mkhali10@asu.edu, US-Pakistan Centre for Advanced Studies in Energy, University of Engineering & Technology, Electrical Department, University of Engineering & Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  2. Majid Ullah, mullah2@asu.edu, US-Pakistan Centre for Advanced Studies in Energy, University of Engineering & Technology, Electrical Department, University of Engineering & Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan.
  3. Wasil Muhammad Khalil, wisalmalik038@gmail.com, Electrical Department, University of Engineering & Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan.

Malik Amad Khalil Majid Ullah Wisal Muhammad Khalil “Life Cycle Assessment of Monocrystalline Versus Polycrystalline Imported Photovoltaic Panels in International Journal of Engineering Works Vol. 7 Issue 12 PP. 422-428 December 2020 https://doi.org/10.34259/ijew.20.712422428.


  1. Farooq M, Shakoor A. Severe energy crises and solar thermal energy as a viable option for Pakistan. J Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013;5:013104
  2. Water and Power Development Authority. 〈http://www.wapda.gov.pk/〉.
  3. Mirza Umar K, Mercedes Maroto-Valer M, Ahmad Nasir. Status and outlook of solar energy use in Pakistan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2003;7.6:501–14
  4. Ahmad Firoz, Intikhab Ulfat. Empirical models for the   correlation of monthly average daily global solar radiation with hours of sunshine on a horizontal surface at Karachi, Pakistan. Turkish J of Phys2004;28.5:301–7
  5. ISO 14040. Environmental management – life cycle  assessment – principles and framework; 1997
  6. Wang Yu, Zhou Sheng, Huo Hong. Cost and CO2 reductions of solar photovoltaic power generation in China: perspectives for 2020. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2014;39:370–80.
  7. Stephen Connors, Katherine Martin, Michael Adams,   Edward Kern, Baafour Asiamah- Adjei. Emissions reductions from solar photovoltaic (PV) systems, LFEE Report No.: 2004– 003
  8. Bakhiyi Bouchra, Labrèche France, Zayed Joseph. The photovoltaic industry on the path to a sustainable future–environmental and occupational health issues. Environ. Int. 2014;73:224–34.
  9. Hosenuzzaman M, Rahim NA, Selvaraj J, Hasanuzzaman M, Malek ABMA, Nahar A. Global prospects, progress, policies, and environmental impact of solar photovoltaic power generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2015;41:284–97
  10. Sun Honghang, Zhi Qiang, Wang Yibo, Yao Qiang, Su Jun. China’s solar photovoltaic industry development: the status quo, problems and approaches. Appl Energy 2014;118:221– 30
  11. Yuwen Zhao. Current development status and future trend of China PV industry. In: 13th China photovoltaic conference: Beijing; September 5–7, 2013
  12. Li Junfeng, Wang Sicheng, Wang Bohua, et al. Annual review and outlook for China PV industry 2013, By the Chinese renewable energy industries association and the China Photovoltaic Industries Association.
  13. Liu Dawei, Shiroyama Hideaki. Development of photovoltaic power in China: a transition perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013;25:782–92
  14. Baharwani Vishakha, Meena Neetu, Dubey Alka, Brighu Urmila, Mathur Jyotirmay. Life cycle analysis of solar PV system: a review. Int J Environ Res Dev 2014;4(2):183–90
  15. Stamford L, Azapagic A. Life cycle environmental impacts of UK shale gas. Appl Energy 2014;134:506–18
  16. Different Solar Potential Co-Ordinates of Pakistan by Fazal Muhammad*, Muhammad Waleed Raza, Surat Khan and Faizullah Khan Electrical Engineering Department BUITEMS, Pakistan
  17. ISO 14041. Environmental management – life cycle assessment – goal and scope definition and inventory analysis; 1998.
  18. Pakistan Council of Renewable Energy Technologies (PCRET)
  19. Hunt LP. Total energy use in the production of silicon solar cells from raw materials to finished product. In: 12th IEEE PV Specialists Conference. New York; November 15–18, 1976. p. 347–52